What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Acquisitive Mind

By Matthew Weigelt

Blog archive

A fresh pair of eyes can bring risks to light

A fresh pair of eyes can see the otherwise unseen risks of management support services coming too close to inherently governmental functions, which others may have missed, the Government Accountability Office says.

Sometimes management support services drift slowly toward sensitive duties that workers don't realize what is happening. However, new employees who come into the program can see the developing problems because they haven't been living with the gradual evolution over a long period. 

“We found that concerns were generally raised by officials who were new to a program office or contracting officials who had assumed responsibilities for an existing contract,” GAO wrote in a report on the risks associated with support services. The report was released Jan.6.

For instance, a senior official in the Transportation Department’s Airline Information Office raised concerns about a lack of expertise among government employees to oversee IT duties. Contractors had developed and also exclusively operated the work for several years.

The contracting officer and contracting officer’s representative in the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Sudan Mission had concerns about interaction among federal employees and contractor staff in a newly established mission office. They feared that security and logistic challenges had left the government overly reliant on contractors’ expertise.

GAO had examples of other areas as well in the report.

GAO was reviewing the increased spending on professional and management support services since fiscal 2005. The services pose risks contractors knowing more about an agency’s operations than the agency’s own employees. Some services can easily bring contractors very close to supporting inherently governmental functions and the federal employees doing them.

Posted by Matthew Weigelt on Jan 10, 2012 at 1:25 PM


Reader Comments

Tue, Jan 24, 2012 jesse

Obviously. But how to implement? Do like the military does - force personnel rotation every few years. The immediate change costs are just a bit less than the overall performanace increases (and weeding out of useless folks).

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above
GCN Awards 2012

GCN eNewsletters

Editorial Webcasts

  • Cloud Computing: Ushering in the Next Wave of Data Center Consolidation Register Now

    In this webcast, a government IT expert will explore the top considerations, operational requirements and policy challenges inherent to integrating new and legacy applications in the cloud. You will explore the pros and cons of adopting a public vs. private cloud model based on your specific security and operational requirements, as well as how you can fully leverage your cloud investment to achieve efficiency, collaboration and transparency needs. Read more