What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

    Close

    Navy: Calibration flaw crashed Yorktown LAN




    PASCAGOULA, Miss.—Human error, not Microsoft Windows NT, was the cause of a LAN
    failure aboard the Aegis cruiser USS Yorktown that left the Smart Ship dead in the water
    for nearly three hours last fall during maneuvers near Cape Charles, Va., Navy officials
    said.


    The Yorktown last September suffered an engineering LAN casualty when a petty officer
    calibrating a fuel valve entered a zero into a shipboard database, officials said. The
    resulting database overload caused the ship’s LAN, including 27 dual 200-MHz Pentium
    Pro miniature remote terminal units, to crash, they said.


    The petty officer, who has since left the Navy, fed the bad data into the Remote Data
    Base Manager, a Standard Monitoring Control System application. SMCS, developed by
    Canadian Aviation Electronics Inc. of Toronto, allows sailors to monitor the ship’s
    engineering and propulsion plant for potential casualties.


    The system provides troubleshooting data and normally indicates whether a valve is open
    or closed without requiring calibration. But something went wrong.


    “There was a problem in that this one valve was closed, but SMCS wasn’t
    indicating it as such,” said Cmdr. Eric Sweigard, the Yorktown’s commanding
    officer. “So this petty officer started playing with the data.


    “This was the only time it occurred, and since then there have been some changes
    made to prevent it from happening again,” he said.


    SMCS managers are now aware of the problem of entering zero into database fields and
    are trained to bypass a bad data field and change the value if such a problem were to
    occur again, Sweigard said.


    “Now that we know what can happen, we’ve realized how to bring the system
    back quickly,” Petty Officer 1st Class Phillip Cramer said. “All we have to do
    is change the zero to any number, and everything comes right back up.”


    The Yorktown was not towed into port as a result of this incident, Sweigard said. The
    ship restored the LAN in about two hours as it made its way to the Naval base at Norfolk,
    Va., under its own power, he said.


    “It’s not something that we desire, but ships do go dead in the water,”
    Sweigard said. “People sometimes make mistakes and systems break. The trick is we
    have trained our crew to react to those situations.”


    The Office of the Navy’s Chief Information Officer is conducting a detailed
    inquiry of the Yorktown incident, Navy officials said. A report from the Navy CIO is
    expected later this month, officials said.


    Regardless of who or what was at fault for the Yorktown LAN failure, the stakes for the
    Navy are high. The service plans to install Smart Ship technology on all its cruisers.


    The Navy selected NT 4.0 as the standard operating system aboard the Yorktown for its
    reliability, functionality, low cost and ease of integration, said Lt. Danny Bethel,
    Yorktown’s electronics material officer. NT runs the Yorktown’s integrated
    bridge, engineering, condition assessment and damage control systems.


    The Yorktown uses dual 200-MHz Pentium Pro systems from Intergraph Corp. of Huntsville,
    Ala., to run NT over a fiber-optic, asynchronous transfer mode LAN. Shipboard users can
    access computers from 15 locations so that the Yorktown can be driven from virtually
    anywhere on the ship.


    The Navy has reduced the Yorktown’s crew from about 350 sailors to 307 personnel
    by adopting new policies and procedures, as well as through the use of commercial
    products, Sweigard said.


    The Navy’s Western Hemisphere Group will begin installing Smart Ship technologies
    aboard the USS Ticonderoga and USS Thomas S. Gates early next year, said Lt. Danny
    Hernandez, public affairs officer for the group in Mayport, Fla.


    Smart Ship was the brainchild of Adm. Jeremy Boorda, the late chief of Naval operations
    who wanted to save money by reducing personnel aboard Navy ships while maintaining
    safety.   

    Reader Comments

    Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

    Your Name:(optional)
    Your Email:(optional)
    Your Location:(optional)
    Comment:
    Please type the letters/numbers you see above

    GCN eNewsletters

    eSeminar