What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

    Virtual meetings get real

    Expensive telepresence systems create a face-to-face illusion, but HD and desktop quality is also on the rise<@VM>Checklist: Videoconferencing systems<@VM>Sidebar: Resources

    VIDEOCONFERENCING, once a privilege used by military commanders
    and agency executives, has gone mainstream. It is now commonly used
    for legally mandated training for first responders, telemedicine
    for veterans and prisoners, and remote court arraignments. Agencies
    are giving it a central role in distance learning, disaster
    recovery and telecommuting strategies, and efforts to improve
    interagency collaboration and speed decision-making.


    Videoconferencing is also one of the few information
    technologies of which government was an early adopter, most notably
    in the Defense Department and other national security agencies.


    'Government was leading the charge for the first few
    years,' said Jeff Prestel, general manager of the Video
    Business Unit at BT Conferencing, an integrator and managed
    services provider. 'The rest of the world has caught
    up.'


    The broad geographic reach of many federal agencies makes
    videoconferencing a natural fit. For example, the Army Management
    Staff College at Fort Belvoir, Va., which trains civilian and
    military leaders, uses it for conferencing and distributed
    learning, having converted an analog system to Tandberg Gatekeepers
    and 1,700 desktop PC units early last year.


    'The technology allows us to reach out in a virtual way
    anywhere in the world,' said Pamela Raymer, dean of
    academics. The college trains garrison commanders and provides
    assistance to deployed commanders who can draw on the
    problemsolving skills of experts. 'What we end up being is
    sort of an adjunct staff to them,' said Col. Garland
    Williams, commandant of the college.


    Meanwhile, videoconferencing is growing faster than the overall
    IT industry. Research firm Frost and Sullivan pegs the North
    American market at $724 million last year, up 29 percent compared
    to the previous year.


    Real deal


    The recent buzz is over telepresence, which is video and audio
    so realistic that they create the illusion of being in the same
    room. No small feat of technology, telepresence demands the best
    high-definition screens. Those screens typically have 1,080-line
    resolution, spatial audio (a sort of location-sensitive stereo),
    unobtrusive user interfaces, intelligent controls, and cameras and
    microphones ' sometimes robotized ' that pick up the
    aural and visual cues that are key elements of face-to-face
    communication.


    Two vendors, Polycom and Tandberg, have introduced telepresence
    products in recent months. In October, Tandberg unveiled the
    Telepresence T3, a complete, carefully engineered immersive room.
    It also introduced a single-monitor version, the T1.
    Polycom's entries are the RealPresence Experience, a whopper
    of a system with displays as large as 16 feet wide that can
    accommodate as many as 28 participants, and the smaller
    TelePresence Experience.


    Telepresence manufacturers strive to make their equipment seem
    to disappear. 'Our ultimate goal is to make sure you have the
    feeling you are in the same room as someone else, and there's
    no technology between you,' said Sean Lessman, senior
    director of advanced technology at Tandberg Federal.


    Tandberg has been moving toward higher-resolution screens and
    making the user interface easier. Some systems even have virtual
    tables, Prestel said. 'When you're in it, in about 30
    seconds, you forget that you are on video,' he said.


    The new 500-pound gorilla of telepresence is Cisco TelePresence.
    'Cisco has totally changed the game,' Prestel said,
    adding that the company might be the only vendor large enough to
    create a market for the technology. 'They've got
    customers thinking about an alternative way of using
    videoconferencing' and they've legitimized
    it.'


    Cisco TelePresence rooms list for $33,900 for a one- or
    two-person, single-panel system for private offices to $340,000 for
    the 18-person, three-panel version. Prestel said he hasn't
    sold any to a government agency but expects to soon. Corporate
    customers gravitate to the $299,000 eight-seat, three-panel model.
    He said his federal base has begun expanding from defense-related
    agencies to civilian agencies, and state governments like video for
    telemedicine, distance learning, and judicial arraignments '
    most of it on traditional, standard-definition video, and some on
    HD. 'Telepresence has not caught on yet with government at
    any level,' Prestel said.


    Organizational cultures might have to shift from outdated
    perceptions of videoconferencing for telepresence to take off in
    government, said Dave Rubal, Cisco's regional manager of
    Federal Unified Communications. 'People really need to see
    telepresence to understand the difference,' Rubal said.
    'It's not the same experience.'


    Basics and bandwidth


    Although vendors such as Cisco say even immersive rooms promise
    quick payback, telepresence comes at a price several times that of
    HD What's more, desktop appliances, software and even webcams
    have improved.


    How do you decide which tier provides the right price and
    performance? 'If quality of the meeting is most important
    ' say a meeting between countries or diplomats ' and
    where bandwidth is readily available, telepresence is a better
    option,' said Roopam Jain, an analyst at Frost and Sullivan.
    'If the application is mostly for remote workers and data
    collaboration is a key need, standard-definition quality will
    suffice.'


    HD doesn't have to be in an immersive room to provide a
    major quality boost over basic videoconferencing systems and
    chintzy webcams. 'In the last year, we've seen
    increased adoption of HD-capable videoconferencing systems,'
    said Ira Weinstein, senior analyst and partner at Wainhouse
    Research.


    LifeSize Communications, which pioneered HD videoconferencing
    three years ago, recently released Room 200, which brings the high
    resolutions and frame rates of 1,920 pixels and 1,080 pixels at 30
    or 60 frames per second (fps), and at lower bandwidths of 1.1
    megabits/sec and 1.7 megabits/sec, respectively.


    Moving up from 30 fps to 60 fps brings greater realism, said
    Michael Helmbrecht, LifeSize's director of product
    management. 'Sixty frames per second is like looking through
    a pane of glass,' Helmbrecht said. 'When something
    moves, you don't get any blurring' or latency that can
    cause people to talk over each other.


    Vendors are seeking to fit video into so-called unified
    communications platforms that include voice and data. On the
    interoperability level, they are adding support for
    Microsoft's Office Communication Server (OCS) and for public
    branch exchange (PBX) and voice-over-IP hardware from companies
    such as Avaya, Cisco, and Nortel.


    Polycom offers VC2, a suite of products, including a
    provisioning server, individualized video portals, and firewall
    traversal. The idea 'is to have visual communication be part
    of a person's everyday workflow'to make it like
    e-mail,' said Laura Shay, director of product marketing in
    Polycom's Video Systems Group.


    LifeSize has a new transcoding feature that lets participants
    calling from desktop webcams join a videoconference on a dedicated
    stream without forcing the other systems to drop to the lowest
    common denominator, a pitfall of other systems, Helmbrecht said.
    'Everybody on the call gets the best experience that their
    system is capable of delivering,' he said.



    1. Ask vendors if they have complete portfolios of
    endpoint choices. If they get there through partnerships, how tight
    is the interoperability with the other company's equipment?
    Beware of proprietary services and equipment that don't
    conform to mainstream standards such as H.323 and SIP.


    2. If you're handling most of a large installation
    internally, consider products that come with automatic
    provisioning.


    3. Look for vendors with a global support capability.
    Videoconferencing has a worldwide reach.


    4. You don't need tons of bandwidth to get a decent
    experience. Compression algorithms, quality of service and other
    techniques turn even desktop video into a viable, conferencing
    tool. Make sure products can support older ISDN infrastructure.


    5. Check to see if your content management server
    supports HD content. Equipment alone won't do it.


    6. Remember that network access is sometimes political,
    with centralized information technology departments guarding their
    territory and collecting tolls on broadband. Play the game to
    ensure the bandwidth you need for videoconferencing.


    BT Conferencing
    www.btconferencing.com


    Cisco Systems
    www.cisco.com


    Frost and Sullivan
    www.frost.com


    LifeSize
    www.lifesize.com


    Polycom
    www.polycom.com


    Tandberg
    www.tandberg.net


    Wainhouse Research
    www.wainhouse.com

    Reader Comments

    Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

    Your Name:(optional)
    Your Email:(optional)
    Your Location:(optional)
    Comment:
    Please type the letters/numbers you see above

    GCN eNewsletters

    eSeminar