GCN LAB IMPRESSIONS

NASA satellites prove Einstein right, again

Gravity probe confirms theories about gravitational effects on space-time

NASA recently announced that it had managed, through the collection of finely tuned satellite data, to confirm some of Albert Einstein’s predictions about relativity. In 2004, NASA started the Gravity Probe B mission by launching four satellites with super-precise gyroscopes. Those devices could actually measure the effect the Earth has on surrounding space-time.

Before someone hits me with a sonic screwdriver, let me explain. Feel free to imagine Carl Sagan’s voice explaining this. Einstein theorized that all gravitational bodies had certain effects on space and time. Imagine some kind of taut elastic cloth stretched out in a horizontal plane. Now put a ball out there in the middle. See how the cloth distorts where the ball is resting? Well, that is something like the way gravitational bodies affect space-time.

Except the space-time disruption tends to make a cone that is a bit pointier than what our ball did. Also, the Earth’s rotation makes the local space-time sort of swirl, as if it were spinning around in some viscous mass that the Earth just half-drags along. The cone thingy is called the geodetic effect, while the syrup business is called frame dragging.

Still with me? Good.

Sure, at least the former effect could be observed by looking at stars behind the sun during a solar eclipse, as was done as far back as Einstein’s time, though cloud cover sometimes halted such efforts.

Only recently were scientists able to develop devices precise enough to actually measure both of those two effects made by our planet, which Einstein predicted would be pretty darn small. And he was right again.

If gravity did not affect space-time, then a satellite in a stable orbit would always be looking in the same direction forever. However, NASA measured that those four satellites actually moved an average of — now get this — 0.0018 degrees per year due to geodetic precession and all of 0.000011 degrees per year due to frame dragging.

Wow, no wonder it took almost 90 years for technology to get good enough to measure values that teeny.

Now, although these discoveries haven’t had any real-world applications, the research and development that made this project possible have led the way in several Global Positioning System applications and certain satellite design ones.

So I guess that just goes to show that “pure science” projects still have real, practical value beyond the betterment of mankind — one that doesn’t always appeal to governments and corporations.

And who knows, can some really cool stuff like time travel be that far behind?

About the Author

Greg Crowe is a former GCN staff writer who covered mobile technology.

Reader Comments

Mon, May 9, 2011 U13

The satellite did not find warps in space. What was found was position drift. The drift is being credited to warped space. The big satellite that has been orbiting the Earth for billions of years, shows no sign of net velocity acceleration from warped space. A reason for more research to reconcile all of the observed data.

Mon, May 9, 2011 cj

Re:Wally's - Einstein would likely be the first to admit he had formal training - teachers, mentors, & colleagues - just not so much success in the "factory school" setting. His brilliance is not in question, but our educational model should be. Read up on one of his mentoresses, Emmy Noether. His relativity theory wouldn't have gotten very far without her.

Mon, May 9, 2011 Wally

I can't belive how smart Einstein was. Imagine that with no formal training he was thinking about how time drags itself around our planet. And then we go and prove him right. Simply amazing.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above