CYBEREYE

DHS getting a bad rap on cybersecurity?

It takes quite a bit to make me feel sorry for the Homeland Security Department. These are, after all, the people who make you wait barefoot in line to be groped and ogled at the airport.

But Sen. John McCain, the self-styled rogue Republican from Arizona, actually managed to make me feel sympathetic to DHS during a recent rant.

“Most of us who have been through an airport have no confidence in the technological capabilities of the Department of Homeland Security,” was the kindest thing he said during a recent Senate Armed Services Committee budget hearing.


Related coverage:

McCain slams DHS, wants DOD to defend cyberspace

Bipartisan cyber bill now the center of partisan turf war


McCain, who would like to see the Defense Department take over responsibility for all U.S. cybersecurity — military and civilian — was questioning why DHS should have any role in this area. His witness, Army Gen. Keith Alexander, commander of the U.S. Cyber Command and director of the National Security Agency, wasn’t giving him much help. He called cybersecurity a team sport and said DHS and the FBI are essential members of that team.
 
Alexander said DOD needs greater visibility into global networks to defend its own systems and civilian U.S. networks from attacks. But he said that visibility should come from cooperation with industry, not direct monitoring, and he showed no interest in poaching on DHS’ turf. “I do not believe we want the military inside our networks, watching it,” he said.

DHS, formed in 2003 in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks, has not had an easy time of it. It is the third-largest Cabinet-level agency and has been on the Government Accountability Office’s high-risk list since its creation. Its response to Hurricane Katrina through the Federal Emergency Management Agency in 2005 was a national disgrace. Even the department’s own employees don’t like it very much.

GAO’s director of homeland security and justice issues, David Maurer, recently told the House Homeland Security Committee that morale at the department remains a problem. Fewer than half of the respondents in 2011 survey by the Office of Personnel Management felt their talents are being well used, and in private rankings the department ranked 31st out of 33 agencies as a good place to work.

Employees do not report being dissatisfied with their pay or the workload but say they don’t feel they are appreciated and lack faith in management. DHS is looking into the problem but has not yet solved it, Maurer said.

And now on top of this, McCain rips into the department, calling it “probably the most inefficient bureaucracy that I have ever encountered in my number of years here as a member of Congress,” and saying that it “has shown an incredible ability to illustrate inefficiency at its best.”

He accused DHS of wasting $887 million on a virtual fence along the Arizona-Mexico border and said it “has not made a single technological advance as far as airport security is concerned.”

By that point I was feeling that somebody ought to speak up for DHS, and since this was a hearing on military budgets and there was no one present from the department, the job fell to Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a rogue in his own right who left the Democratic Party to become an independent.

“Obviously my friend from Arizona and I have a disagreement here,” he said. “The first thing I want to do is come to the defense of the Department of Homeland Security. The fact is we haven’t had a major terrorist attack in the U.S. since 9-11, and you have to give the leadership over two administrations and the thousands of people who work at DHS some credit for that.”

More than 10 years without an attack. That’s not a bad record.

 

Reader Comments

Fri, Apr 27, 2012 unbiased WASH DC

DHS was a great idea, created by political necessity after 9/11. but the truth of the matter is that it doesn't really work very well. the infrastructure is a mess. you can point to many reasons why but it's simply management (lack of). that's why you hear Sen. McCain push the DoD; the military has a very clear chain of command, clearly defined directives, good communication, and a goal

Thu, Apr 5, 2012 BaltFed Baltimore

It was a different world before 9-11; the two biggest domestic hits were the first WTC bombing and Oklahoma City, with was a home-grown terrorist. There were plenty of attacks abroad (Pan Am over Lockerbie, Beiruit, Kobar Towers, USS Cole in Yemen a year before 9-11, and various US Embassy attacks) but no other major attacks here. I'm surprised that DHS was able to create itself from the myriad agencies tossed into the mix as quickly has it has, and there are some successes, like the Coast Guard. I'd say their biggest problems are Border Control and Airline Security. The fact that there was no air marshal aboard the Underwear Bomber flight is appaling (as was the lack of communication between State and DHS about the bomber himself). Personally, I'd ISSUE a weapon to everyone boarding a plane, since the Good Guys always outnumber the Bad Guys, but then, I probably thing very far out of the box too often.

Mon, Apr 2, 2012 Cowboy Joe

In case the above don't remember - 1995 was Oklahoma City (6 years), prior to that was the first WTC bombing in 1993 (8 years), then Pan Am 103 in 1988 (13 years) ... and those are just the big ones ... There've been several attempts since 2001, but even I gotta' admit - cooperation between agencies, knowledge sharing, and a barnyard fulla' luck have been the key factors in those successes.

Mon, Apr 2, 2012 Charles Kerr Hollywood, Florida

DHS, and specifically the TSA, have such a huge hole to climb out of before they can ever move forward I have to wonder if it would be best to scrap it and start over. And specifically to Sen. Lieberman... We haven't had a major terrorist attack since I switched to the new toothpaste, so I think I deserve just as much credit as DHS for helping to protect America.

Mon, Apr 2, 2012

How many years prior to 911 did we go without an attack. 10 years doesn't say much...

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above