Reality Check

Blog archive
competition

What the escalating war among cloud computing rivals means for you

This week, IBM took out several ads trumpeting its cloud market share. Following quickly on the heels of IBM’s announcement, Google announced the “general  availability” of the Google Compute Engine, a direct competitor to Amazon Web Services’ Elastic Compute Cloud. 

Along with the upgrade of its service from beta to general availability, Google also announced three new features of its infrastructure-as-a-service offering: lower price, greater Linux support and the Docker “container-as-a-service”  platform. What’s going on? Let’s examine each of these developments and then consider the ramifications. 

Google dropped its prices by 10 percent for the most popular IaaS compute instances and 60 percent for disk storage. Price competition for IaaS services is continuing to heat up, with many sites calling it a “cloud price war.” In fact, 12 hours after Google’s announcement, AWS announced a 26 percent drop in prices for its Windows virtual machines. 

The second leg of Google’s cloud platform announcements introduced increased Linux support for any “out-of-the-box Linux distribution” to include SELinux, CoreOS, SUSE, FreeBSD and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. At the same time it should be noted that Linux Virtual Machines are cheaper and therefore more popular in the cloud than Microsoft virtual machines. 

One interesting and possibly unique feature of the Google Cloud Platform (at least amongst its main IaaS rivals) is support for the Docker container-as-a-service platform. Linux containers are a form of “operating system virtualization” or an application container that enables each application to have its own environment as if it were the only application running on the system (its own file system, memory space, system libraries, etc.).  

These containers are more efficient than machine virtualization, so IT managers can run many more simultaneous containers than they can run virtual machines. Additionally, containers spin up instantly unlike the boot time of operating systems that take minutes. 

Thus, containers are a real threat to IaaS vendors that only support virtual machines. Docker is an open-source project that is making containers easier to use, more secure and more portable. Though only a small footnote in Google’s announcement, Docker support could prove more valuable than all the other announcements.

Now let’s briefly shift back to IBM and its battle to gain traction in the IaaS cloud space. In this month’s Fortune magazine, IBM took out three full-page ads to announce: “IBM Cloud hosts 30 percent more top websites than anyone in the world” and “Whose cloud powers 270,000 more websites than Amazon?” and “IBM Cloud supports 24 of the top 25 Fortune 500 companies.” These lofty claims seem more like cherry-picking the facts given the common knowledge that Amazon leads the IaaS/PaaS markets by a wide margin. 

For the customer, this hyper-competition is a good thing. The price war is part of the drive toward cloud computing as a commodity with prices impossible to ignore. We are approaching price points that make running your own data center sound as foolish as running your own electric power plant. 

So, I say, keep up the fierce competition!

Michael C. Daconta (mdaconta@incadencecorp.com) is the Vice President of Advanced Technology at InCadence Strategic Solutions and the former Metadata Program Manager for the Homeland Security Department. His new book is entitled, The Great Cloud Migration: Your Roadmap to Cloud Computing, Big Data and Linked Data.

Posted by Michael C. Daconta on Dec 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM


Reader Comments

Thu, Jan 9, 2014 NibletsandGravy

"We are approaching price points that make running your own data center sound as foolish as running your own electric power plant.

" I know you are exaggerating, but my opinion is in some cases it may make sense to run your own electric power plant. It depends on how important access to electricity is to what you do and how reliable the outside transmission system is. I have my own remote server in the cloud and it does save me money. The vendor provides better availability and security than I could without a direct high speed network. For non secure applications I think remote storage, apps etc. are great. My only concern with all of the talk about the cloud is cost. Well, that and security. Some vendors really over charge the government when they realize they are providing services that we no longer have ownership or in-depth knowledge of. I hope that will not happen as we move toward cloud computing. I almost think it would be better in the long run to have an internal "cloud" run by one agency. The benefits would be the same for those who want/need remote storage and management, and the long term costs may be lower. Security may also be more predictable.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

resources

HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Transforming Constituent Services with Business Process Management
  • Improving Performance in Hybrid Clouds
  • Data Center Consolidation & Energy Efficiency in Federal Facilities