Information Security
The CISO Rises to the Top
By
Teri Robinson
Practically a foreign concept a decade ago, the Chief Information
Security Officer (CISO) has become a solid fixture within federal
government and has gained clout as agencies have made information
security a top priority.
Experts contend that a critical part of any agency security policy and
strategy is to have someone in charge of implementing, monitoring and
ensuring that policy is carried out. And agencies have taken that to
heart. A survey by the 1105 Government Information Group last year
found that 87 percent of the respondents had a CISO or CISO-equivalent
in place.
But unfortunately, if the CISO position wasn’t simply a
figurehead, it was close. Most lacked the authority to even gather
information critical to security and compliance from deep within in the
ranks of their own agencies. But that has
changed…significantly.
In a report published last year by (ISC)
2,
“A View from the
Front Line: The State of Cybersecurity from the federal Chief
Information Security Officer’s Perspective,” 90
percent of the respondents said that they had significant influence on
their agency’s security strategy.
“The CISOs’ responses clearly demonstrate that
cybersecurity is evolving in terms of management priority,”
said W. Hord Tipton, executive director of (ISC)
2, an organization
which educates and certifies security professionals.
“Although CISOs are still facing organizational challenges,
we view it as a positive sign that CISOs feel they are being listened
to by senior management and that their recommendations are, for the
most part, being considered and implemented. However, that has not
always been the case in the past.”
CISOs reported in the survey that there were still an abundance of
issues that agencies must address and over the past year, some of their
needs have begun to be met.
For instance, (ISC)
2 noted that CISOs “strongly favor(ed) a
shift from compliance reporting to continuous monitoring, as well as
the imposition of stricter security requirements during the acquisition
of all major IT systems.” And in May of this year, the U.S.
House of Representatives moved to do just that by passing the National
Defense Authorization Act. The legislation contains an amendment that
would move agencies away from cumbersome paper-based compliance reports
to continuous monitoring through a Web-based gateway.
CISOs in the (ISC)
2 report also expressed the need for “more
resources and even more senior buy-in than they’re currently
getting to accomplish their mission.” The proposed FISMA
overhaul in part addresses the latter, giving CISOs greater latitude in
gathering data from different departments and bureaus within their
agencies.
And, of course, acquiring the proper resources, be it technology or
people, has been a struggle against a tight budget for most CISOs. In
the 1105 Government Information Group survey, 50 percent of the
respondents said they expected to hire security personnel in the next
12 months. But many said they would turn to contract workers. The
(ISC)
2 respondents noted that they seek workers with
“experience, professional certifications and communication
skills.”
The Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative 2 (CNCI2) announced
this spring will focus on training and education and the creation
of educational tracks and degree programs to turn out
security professionals. In addition, a number of measures in that
initiative will coordinate and manage “the federal enterprise
network as a single network enterprise.” By understanding and
coordinating security initiatives across agencies, the government can
identify the points of vulnerability, recommend where agencies need to
take action and stimulate the use of shared resources.
Most CISOs in the (ISC)
2 survey claimed to be satisfied with their
jobs. But while they note that they are more influential than ever
before, they have a long way to go. According to the study,
“76 percent of CISOs report to the agency Chief Information
Officer, but none to the Chief Operating Officer, the Chief Financial
Officer or the Chief Risk Officer, which CISOs believe limits their
overall effectiveness.”