Government Computer News
Some see ‘business as usual’ in homeland security IT efforts
PHILADELPHIA—Policy lags behind the desires of federal officials striving to integrate disparate systems to share data to support the nation’s war on terrorism, speakers and attendees at the Information Sharing for Homeland Security conference said yesterday.
Digg
De.licio.us
Slashdot
Technorati
There is an emerging sense of business as usual, one senior intelligence community IT official said. "It is clear that complacency has definitely set in," he said, adding that he "hadn't seen anything new at the conference. It is a rehashing of old issues."
The sense of urgency has abated, too, said a National Security Agency official. "Last year, it was an attitude of frenetic activity and urgency,” he said. “Now, it is no longer the heroic efforts of individuals; the machine is in place."
Getting things done in Washington demands regulations, agreements and laws—those take time to create, digest and take effect, other officials countered.
Lee Holcomb, chief technology officer for the Homeland Security Department, reeled off three policy documents that have IT components that must be reconciled: the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the administration's national homeland security strategy and a secret memorandum of understanding signed by CIA director George Tenet and attorney general John Ashcroft. Each includes details that affect the sharing of domestic defense information at the highest levels, he said.
"Without the policies, you cannot architect and implement the systems," Holcomb said. "As you move from the strategic to the tactical levels,” harmonizing the policies and procedures with systems plans becomes more difficult.
And sometimes finalizing the policies is often more difficult than resolving technical barriers, he said. For instance, sharing information among agencies that monitor the nation’s borders for the purpose of allowing or denying someone entry is relatively easy "because the alien has the burden of proof, and you have access to a richer set of data."
But using IT to share information within the country "is more difficult because the burden of proof must be borne by the government," Holcomb said.
He expressed hope that the multiple agencies trying to weave together systems that need to share homeland security data can settle their policy and procedural disagreements over the next few months.
"You must have the top-down business process in place to build the architectures" for such wide-ranging systems, he said, as well as agreed-upon metadata standards that will ease data searches and exchanges.
![1105 Government Information Group [justice]](/images/1105logo_website.gif "Government Computer News [justice]")
© 1996-2008 1105 Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
