How to survive a criminal contract investigation

Last month, I described some excessive criminal investigations and tactics relating to
federal contracts. Now I would like to give some practical suggestions for avoiding such
problems and for surviving an investigation. These suggestions do not substitute for legal
advice, of course.


A good rule of thumb is to review any e-mail on a sensitive business subject and ask
yourself how an FBI agent who thinks the worst of you might read that message--or how it
would look in the pages of the Washington Post, or in bid protest documents.


If the Fifth Amendment was good enough for Madison and Jefferson, it should be good
enough for you. Once a criminal investigation begins, the people most likely to end up in
a one-size-fits-all orange jumpsuit as a guest of the federal government are those who
talk to investigators and prosecutors.


Clients generally feel there is something bad about not talking. Get over it. If the
government needs your testimony, a skilled lawyer may be able to obtain a grant of
immunity, which makes it far more difficult for the government to indict the witness.


Government employees also are covered by the Fifth Amendment. If you're a government
employee and uncertain whether the government might proceed criminally against you, ask
for a written Kalkines waiver before any interview. The Kalkines decision gives the
interviewee the right to rely upon the Fifth Amendment, unless the government is willing
to waive its right to use the information in a criminal proceeding.


Kalkines essentially forces the government to make a choice. If the investigators
proceed with a criminal case, government employees can remain silent. If the government
waives criminal investigation, then government employees have to answer, eventually, or
lose their jobs for failing to do so.


Of course, the answers also may cost you your job, but losing your job is better than
doing time. However, this is a pretty tricky area. Government employees can be disciplined
if they inappropriately refuse to answer. If you are this far involved, simply say you
need to consider the matter with your lawyer, even if you don't have one yet, to buy some
time.


Stephen M. Ryan is a partner in the Washington law firm of Brand, Lowell &
Ryan. He has long experience in federal information technology issues.



inside gcn

  • artificial intelligence (ktsdesign/Shutterstock.com)

    Machine learning with limited data

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group