Calif. throws up RFID roadblock

The California Senate has approved the first legislation in the country to block state and local government agencies from issuing identification cards containing radio frequency identification tags.

In a May 16 29-7 vote, the senators passed SB 682, the Identity Information Protection Act, which prohibits California public agencies from issuing ID cards containing 'a contactless integrated circuit or device that can broadcast personal information or enable personal information to be scanned remotely.' The description covers RFID devices and tags, among others.

RFID devices, which can contain personal information such as name, address, phone number and date of birth, have become controversial following the State Department's decision to place RFID tags on new passports.

Privacy advocates object to RFID tags on identification documents because of concerns that the personal information on the tag could be read from several feet away by anyone with an RFID reader, enabling identity theft and possibly endangering American tourists in public places abroad. The State Department is considering additional security improvements to prevent unauthorized reading of the tags.

Last year, nearly 40,000 Californians were victims of identity theft, and the devices would make that crime even easier to commit, according to the Northern California branch of the American Civil Liberties Union, which backed the anti-RFID bill.

'California legislators have always been on the forefront of passing important legislation to balance the potential benefits of emerging technology while safeguarding the privacy and security of Californians,' said Nicole Ozer, policy director for technology and civil liberties of the ACLU branch. 'The Senate's passage of this bill has sent a strong bipartisan message that the privacy and security of Californians must be protected.'

The legislation, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Joe Simitian, also would make it unlawful for a person to read or attempt to read an identification document without the owner's knowledge, according to the ACLU.

The bill now goes to the California Assembly.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

inside gcn

  • smart city (jamesteohart/Shutterstock.com)

    Toolkit for building a smart city plan

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group