IPv6: Where s the return on investment?

ORLANDO, Fla.'Where's the return on investment is the question coming from agencies concerned about the mandated transition to Internet Protocol Version 6, without rest from the other priority projects on their plates.

There is no immediate return on investment, Dan Matthews, vice president of government relations at Lockheed Martin, said today at the Information Processing Interagency Conference 2006 in Orlando, Fla. But he added that driving cars instead of riding horses brought no immediate return either.

'The rest of the world is blowing by us,' said Matthews, who moderated a panel discussing the transition to IPv6 from the current IPv4 infrastructure.

Last year, the Office of Management and Budget laid out a June 2008 deadline for departments and agencies to be ready for IPv6. Matthews, former chief information officer at the Transportation Department and formerly the CIO Council's vice chairman, said he pushed for a deadline three years away.

Agency frustration stems from OMB's verdict: Agencies need no new money to finish the daunting project.

'The fact of the matter is that we don't need new money,' Matthews said. He echoed OMB officials' comments last year calling IPv6 a technology refresh. Agencieswill have to adapt and reallocate funds. Karen Evans, OMB's administrator of e-government and information technology, said Monday in her IPIC 2006 keynote address that OMB wants efficiency along with good performance from agencies' programs. With the money saved through efficiency, she said agencies should shift those dollars to such mandates.

Thomas Kreidler, vice president of Juniper Federal Systems at Juniper Network and a panelist, said other countries are 'substantially farther along that we are.' He said Asia received 9 percent of IP addresses while it represents half of the world's population. Asian countries' infrastructures were less developed than the United States, and so their transition is necessary. Now they, as well as Western Europe, are installing the best and latest infrastructures.

Matthews concluded: 'We are responsible for moving ourselves forward.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

inside gcn

  • Phishing

    Phishing is still a big problem, but users can help shrink it

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group