Windows 7 and netbooks: A bad mix

Contrary to popular belief, W7 slows down netbook performance

Some of the comments on my Windows 7 review and follow-up piece suggested that I try the new OS on a netbook. As it happened, we recently had that opportunity, as Greg Crowe was preparing a roundup review on netbooks that will appear early next month.

Greg also has posted an excellent article about the horror that was the netbook, and what exactly one of those things was, and is today.

Basically, a netbook is a tiny notebook without an optical drive. Almost all of them have Intel Atom processors. And all of the netbooks that we brought into the lab for the review ran Windows XP. Given that Windows 7 is supposedly designed with these stripped-down machines in mind, it made sense that we might see some performance gains on those systems.

And in one area we did. The install times were significantly faster than we experienced before. One netbook had the new OS ready in just 37 minutes. The other was even quicker, and was up to speed in 35 minutes.

However, the same performance lag we found moving from XP to W7 on desktops was also evident with the netbooks, only to a much greater extent. Case in point: A netbook with an Atom N270 processor running at 1.6 GHz got a respectable 246.4 on our Passmark Performance Test benchmarks version 7.0 with XP. But after the W7 install, this dropped to 188.8. That’s a 58 point drop, meaning the poor netbook runs 24 percent slower than before. Users will definitely feel that.

The second netbook had an Atom N280 processor running at 1.66 GHz. With XP, it got 259.4 on the benchmark, which is not surprising given that it’s a slightly faster processor than the N270. However, it also dropped big time once W7 came on board, to 214.2. So you can expect an 18 percent drop in performance if you move that system from XP to W7.

There will be those who jump all over this, saying that we hate Windows 7 or Microsoft or that we are 33rd degree Masons involved in some conspiracy. But we merely report the facts, and the numbers can’t lie. The truth is that while W7 does seem to install faster on these tiny powerhouses, it also bogs them down compared with XP. If you really want to get the best performance out of your netbook, XP would be the OS of choice.

About the Author

John Breeden II is a freelance technology writer for GCN.

inside gcn

  • smart city (jamesteohart/Shutterstock.com)

    Toolkit for building a smart city plan

Reader Comments

Fri, Nov 6, 2009 Terry Howe

I have a Toshiba NB 205 with a 500GB HD and 2gb memory and I have been running Windows 7 Professional since Windows 7 has been released and I LOVE it! Not a single problem so far and it travels with me all over the place.

Tue, Nov 3, 2009

This article really needs more research I agree.... I run win7 everyday and in our environment on netbooks, and with our network, it has done very well.. does multitasking well also. We feel safer, and know we are this time with win7

Tue, Nov 3, 2009 Loren M. Lang

Was this Starter Edition or Home?

Mon, Nov 2, 2009

How do you spell déjà vu? Windows 7 and Vista?

Mon, Nov 2, 2009

One other option not mentioned is to run Linux on a netbook. It has a much smaller footprint than a MS OS so it would work well with a small SSD. I have desktops running XP and Vista and a laptop running XP that can't come close to matching the boot time of my netbook (with a 900 MHz Celeron) running Linux. Applications run almost as fast also.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group