FEMA's planned disaster game should pull no punches

'Disaster Hero' will be more effective if players face real consequences

Earthquakes, fires, floods and terrorist attacks aren’t typically the subjects of computer games. Well, that last one has shown up quite a few times, actually, but the others are rare. And almost no games are sponsored by the federal government.

“Disaster Hero” is intended to be different, both in its sponsorship and in what its makers want to accomplish. The game is being created to run completely online and is designed to help children and families prepare for, and survive, disasters of all types.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is sponsoring the effort, and veteran game creator Legacy Interactive is developing it. The company created the critically acclaimed “Law and Order” games, where players can take on the roles of the famous TV prosecutors and detectives. So there’s little doubt that “Disaster Hero” has potential.

Normally these free, Web-based titles are, well, boring. But Legacy Interactive has made some pretty good games besides “Law and Order,” many of them aimed at children. “Pet Pals, Animal Doctor” is particularly good. If the game follows that tradition, it could really catch on.

FEMA is looking for suggestions for the game’s development. So if you’ve got an idea, submit it to suggestions@disasterhero.com.

Here’s mine: Don’t sugarcoat the title. Disasters are serious business; that’s why they’re called disasters. I’m not saying there should be flying body parts or people dying right and left (I get that in most of the games I play now), but players in Disaster Hero should be forced to make real choices and suffer real consequences.

If you aren’t adequately prepared, your characters should die. That’s what would happen in real life, and players -- whether kids or adults -- should see that there are real dangers out there. Otherwise, why make the game? The screen can simply fade to black and say that you didn’t make it, and then offer to re-start from a point where you can try again.

“Oregon Trail” is probably one of the best known and successful educational games of all time, and its mortality rate for players was well over 50 percent. People and kids learn better by doing than by being told something. And dying in a game might just prevent a real fatality when it counts. Plus, if it’s actually cool, more people will play, and the game will have a bigger impact.

The fact that the game is being made in conjunction with The American College of Emergency Physicians is a good sign that the project is being taken seriously. Dr. Angela Gardner, ACEP president said, “this project to develop an educational program for children using a game platform will be a unique approach to teaching kids to have an active role in home disaster planning.”

A FEMA statement added that, “despite imminent threats and increased media attention, Americans today are no better prepared for a natural disaster or terrorist attack than they were in 2003.”

Perhaps “Disaster Hero” can help.

About the Author

John Breeden II is a freelance technology writer for GCN.

inside gcn

  • analytics (Wright Studio/Shutterstock.com)

    3 data strategies to help crackdown on internal corruption

Reader Comments

Thu, Jun 24, 2010 O.T. fan

Learning what NOT to do is probably more important than guessing well on what to do. Dying a few hundered times in a simulator is probably a lot more fun than dying for real.

Thu, Jun 24, 2010 Rita

I am not a gamer so, the value of games in real life is not something I understand. I do understand instilling values in children and then allowing them to make life choices as they grow (with parental guidance). But what I really want to mention is that I am constantly amazed in how small decisions can make a real difference. For instance, the firefighter who stayed to help a disabled woman come down the stairs who lived to tell about his escape from the World Trade Tower collapse. People who did what their instinct told them to do and leave the tower despite authorities insisting things were safe. How do you make a game teach lessons like that?

Thu, Jun 24, 2010 Shawn

I hope that they include zombie attacks. It could happen.

Thu, Jun 24, 2010 Al Powell

Haha. I forgot all about Oregon Trail. Thanks for letting me remember. I used to play that on an Apple IIe back in school. I'm gonna see if I can find a copy for my kids to play now!

Wed, Jun 23, 2010 BaltFed

For those who never played it, in Oregon Trail, if you caught or died of a disease, you could click a link to find out about the disease, its symptoms, and its likely outcome. Smallpox, Dysentery, Yellow Fever, Typhoid Fever, Typhus, and other Fine Old Diseases of Days Gone By. Then there was starving to death, dying from lack of water, freezing to death, breaking limbs, wasting too much ammunition hunting, your oxen dying, making the wrong choice of supplies ... all in all, not a bad simulation of the not-so--Romantic side of Pioneer Life. Probably the only thing left out was the Donner Party scenario, which wasn't much of a party anyway! Nowadays I guess they'd have to plug in respiratory distress from the formaldehyde in the plywood in FEMA Trailers. :-Þ

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group