TSA may have a solution for virtual-striptease body scans

Testing under way on software that replaces a person's image with an avatar

The Transportation Security Agency may have found a solution to the privacy issues raised by its planned use of full-body scanners that reveal near-naked images of passengers as they go through airport sectury.

Instead of the actual bodies, screeners will see an avatar representing a generic human figure. L-3 Communications Holdings and OSI Systems’ Rapiscan, providers of full-body scanners to U.S. airports, will be upgrading their software to accommodate this change, according to a report in Bloomberg.

The scanners can show concealed weapons, explosives or other contraband, but only by also showing the passenger's body under clothing. Many privacy advocates objected, and fears that screeners would be ogling -- or ridiculing -- the bodies of travelers came to dominate the debate. 

A Unisys report found that a majority of travelers didn’t mind a full-body scan, but privacy advocacy group The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed suit against the government on April 21 seeking to halt the program.

“TSA continues to explore additional privacy protections for imaging technology,” said Greg Soule, a spokesman for the security agency, in the Bloomberg article. “Testing [of the software] is currently under way.”

Use of an avatar should address most privacy concerns, Peter Kant, a Rapiscan executive vice president, said in an interview with Bloomberg. The avatar will look “like a guy wearing a baseball cap,” he said. Concealed objects will still be evident.

Three Republican senators requested the technology in airports April 12 after returning from a trip to the Netherlands, where the technology was installed at Amesterdam’s Schiphol International Airport. 

TSA has full-body scanners at 51 airports, with an additional 28 airports getting the technology by the end of the year, Bloomberg reported. TSA has plans to install 1,000 full-body scanners at airports by the end of next year, covering more than than half the security lanes at major U.S. airports.

L-3’s technology, which has one of its revised scanners in use at Schiphol Airport, is currently being reviewed in a federal laboratory, according to Bloomberg's story. Rapiscan’s software will be submitted for review this month.

Months will be spent testing the technology, said Jeffrey Sural, an attorney for Alston & Bird LLP in Washington and a former assistant administrator at the security agency, the story said.

Currently, full-body scanning is voluntary, although TSA employees may frisk passengers who refuse to be scanned. Over 98 percent of passengers chose full-body scanning over alternative screening procedures, said TSA.

Images from the scanners are reviewed by TSA employees in a separate room to address privacy concerns – such as passengers being able to see pictures of fellow passengers naked. With an avatar, the need for a separate room with additional employees would be eliminated, reducing personnel costs.

TSA had increased the number of full-body scanners to be deployed at airports, as well as the timeline for installing them, in response to a December 2009 attempted terrorist attack.

However, the software upgrade does not resolve privacy issues, as these images may someday be recorded or linked to traveler names, said Marc Rotenberg, president of EPIC, in the Bloomberg report.

About the Author

Kathleen Hickey is a freelance writer for GCN.

inside gcn

Reader Comments

Wed, Sep 15, 2010

Why are we wasting money on this? The scanners work the way they are. In the long run this costs the traveler money, stop putting a dress on a duck and move on.

Tue, Sep 14, 2010

It's funny. All these people that complain about the scanners are the same people that scream and yell that the government is not doing enough to keep the skies safe. I travel every week and yes it slows the process down but unfortunately since 9/11 that's the world we live in. The people complaining are also the people that says we should not be at war against the terrorist.

Tue, Sep 14, 2010 Bartleby

I am far more concerned with the dose of radiation these devices deliver. The TSA goons are trained to minimize our concerns about ionizing radiation but who's kidding whom: this is a nice bath of radiation to every square inch of your skin, every time you fly.

Tue, Sep 14, 2010 Jim

The entire TSA security program is a farce and an insult to every citizen of the USA - violating many of the liberties guaranteed by our constitution. I wish government would get out of the way and allow the airline and their customers to decide what is an acceptable level of risk for air travel. For example, I would much rather fly an airline that allows all passengers licensed to carry a concealed firearm to do so. If you look at the history, fellow passengers have been most effective at stopping in-flight terrorist attempts NOT the TSA. I believe armed citizens licensed and trained in the use of firearms for personal protection would be a greater deterrent and I for one trust them more than the team of “welfare workers in blue” I must endure each time I choose to travel by air.

Tue, Sep 14, 2010 Jim

"Over 98 percent of passengers chose full-body scanning over alternative screening procedures, said TSA." Do people really know they have a choice? From my experience in travel, people go where ever the cattle prod pushes them. The TSA needs to let people know they have a choice otherwise people will only do what the uniformed authority tells them to do. There would also be a fear that opting for alternate screening will get one put on the blacklist as a troublemaker. Besides, with the number of baggage handlers arrested this year for smuggling drugs onto airplanes, it makes you wonder about the quality of scanning on the backend.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group