Can technology erode a mountain of classified documents?

DARPA asks for input on how to declassify documents more efficiently

The U.S. government is looking for new technologies to help sift through and declassify mountains of Defense Department documents. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has released a request for information for methods to help the National Declassification Center work more efficiently.

President Obama’s issued an executive order in 2009, called “Classified National Security Information,” that emphasized the need for methods to improve the ability of departments and agencies to identify still-sensitive information while declassifying as much information as possible and making it available to the public.

To meet this goal, the RFI invites industry and universities to submit white papers with ideas and concepts describing possible new technologies or innovations of existing approaches. Spencer Ackerman with Wired’s Danger Room speculated that many of the technologies are likely to be semantic keyword search algorithms, but that there may be other possibilities as well. Ackerman noted that NDC chief Neil Carmichael had said in 2009 that his key challenge is not the amount of data but the sheer variety of media — paper, microfilm, microform, film or electronic data — from which to declassify information.

The deadline for RFI submissions is Oct. 10.

inside gcn

  • open doors to cloud (Sergey Nivens/

    New vendors join FedRAMP Connect

Reader Comments

Mon, Sep 20, 2010 Grace Miazza Wash DC area

Caution needs to be taken that the information is also reviewed for export controlled content prior to release. Many documents that while not classified but were export controlled were released under a 1995 executive order that were then pulled back out of the National Archives. Unfortunately the review was only for if the content was classified secret or not, which was also imperfectly accomplished.

Fri, Sep 17, 2010

They ALSO need to put aomething on the line running INTO the holding tank, so the problem does not keep getting worse. WAY too many people have classification authority, and the 'when in doubt, stamp it secret' mindset still rules. Yes, some things DO need to be classified, but if it was limited to stuff that actually mattered, people might take the whole process more seriously.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group