DOD aims to send health records via any device, to any user

Early success builds momentum for virtual desktop

The military’s interest in virtualization tools for health care personnel originated well before the Defense Department began to lay the foundation for the Chicago and Washington Capitol super hospitals.

An early example was at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, Va. In 2006, Acelera, a firm specializing in virtualization tools, was contracted by the hospital to solve problems that in-house doctors and shipboard clinicians had when trying to access AHLTA, DOD's electronic health records system.

Related coverage:

Can a hot desktop cure a frozen medical network?

The challenges experienced by the doctors at Portsmouth were not unique to AHLTA. Joe Brown, president of Accelera Solutions, said powerful desktops are necessary because medical programs perform lots of tasks and often have high-resolution graphics, which make it difficult to refresh data quickly.

“The overhead is massive,” he said.

Because of the success of the Portsmouth effort, the virtual desktop capability is being implemented across the Military Health System. The near-term goal is to deliver virtual clinical applications to all doctors in MHS through a DOD-based cloud architecture.

Brown noted that in the future, DOD wants to use virtual desktops as a method for delivering applications. The ultimate goal is to supply clinical applications from thin-client desktop PCs to any device, such as iPads, laptops or other handheld devices, and make those applications available anywhere users are — in a hospital, aboard ship or on the battlefield.

inside gcn

  • When cybersecurity capabilities are paid for, but untapped

Reader Comments

Mon, Apr 4, 2011

I have no respect for our family's military electronic health records. They are riddled with errors and strange irrelevant double negative entries. Having them more accessible is useless to counterproductive. Any advantage sought by crunching the numbers of a large population would hinge on accuracy of information. I am highly uncomfortable with even accurate records being held and disseminated electronically, for reasons of privacy. I can't tell you how uncomfortable I am with serious mistakes that as yet seem virtually uncorrectable--I have heard " don't know how" to "I am not comfortable changing another doctor's entry" for a first diagnosis even when a radically less problematic second opinion diagnosis was confirmed and successfully treated. Resolved problems linger under the heading "chronic" and family histories are contradictory among members, and incorrect or misleading. For instance, one child has "Smoking" listed. The last family member who smoked (grandparent) gave it up 30 years ago--long before we married, much less had children. The child has never been exposed to second hand smoke. One doctor told me they never consider the records because of such inaccuracies and take only first hand information. I would be happy to see them disappear. I simply think they are more subject to error and misuse than keeping notes in a file.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group