Can the Web force the release of bin Laden photos?

Demand for pictures, and risks to people searching for them, could force the administration's hand

The online search for photos of Osama bin Laden’s body has grown to enormous and sometimes comical proportions, which might eventually cause the Obama administration to rethink its decision not to release them.

Bin Laden was killed May 1 in a lightning raid by Navy SEALs at his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. The administration confirmed the terrorist leader's identity through facial recognition, DNA and a positive identification from one of bin Laden’s wives.

That proof, officials have contended, has made the release of the photos unnecessary. They’ve said the photos were gruesome, which could upset some people who saw them and might prompt retaliation from bin Laden supporters.

But can sound reasoning stand up against the power of the Web?

Related stories:

Psst, want to see photos of bin Laden’s body?

Bin Laden could run but ultimately not hide from technology

Despite the FBI's warnings that any photos purported to be of bin Laden — touted in e-mails and other links — are fake and likely attached to scams and malware operations, people are still searching for them relentlessly.

News organizations have posted supposed photos of the terrorist leader, then withdrawn them after they were confirmed as fakes — although the fakes are still around on YouTube and plenty of other sites.

Three U.S. senators themselves were fooled by fake photos. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), all members of the House Armed Services Committee, said they had seen a photo of bin Laden’s body, then were chagrined when it turned out to be phony, MSNBC reported.

Now, members of four congressional committees — the House and Senate intelligence committees and the House and Senate armed services committees (the three faked-out senators will finally get to see the real thing) — will get to view the photos, the Washington Post reports.

But will it end there? Will the privileged few be the only ones to see them, or might other, envious members of Congress devise ways to get to see them, too? From there, it could only spread.

Meanwhile, people on the Web are taking risks with their phones, tablets and PCs in search of photos that, to date, do not exist on the Web.

And Judicial Watch is attempting to make the decision for the administration, filing a Freedom of Information Act request for release of “all photographs and/or video recordings of Osama (Usama) bin Laden taken during and/or after the U.S. military operation in Pakistan on or about May 1, 2011.”

So the administration might have to devise a practical method and timetable for releasing the photos, even if it’s against its better judgment.

Andrew Cohen at The Atlantic suggests an entrepreneurial approach, charging people to see the photos, and donating the proceeds to funding the war on terror or setting up a scholarship for the families of 9/11 victims.

Maybe they could be released to the National Archives or Library of Congress.

At any rate, the drumbeat for releasing the photos seems to be growing, and allowing select members of Congress to view them could just start the ball rolling.

By all accounts of those who have seen them, the photos are gruesome, but Jon Stewart has contended that the opening credits of any of the “CSI” shows have as much or more gore as the bin Laden photos. (“You know what we call it? Primetime.”)

The argument that releasing the photos will prove bin Laden’s death might not hold up, since most people seem to be satisfied with the evidence already and conspiracy theorists — being called “deathers” in some corners — might only give the administration credit for mastering Photoshop. After all, some people still think the lunar landings were a hoax performed on a sound stage.

But others, including Judicial Watch, have made an argument for transparency, which has been a stated goal of the Obama administration. And the demand is there, whether the interest is driven mostly by curiosity or something darker. If Donald Trump could force the release of a long-form birth certificate — when the official version had already been released — millions of users might be able to force the administration’s hand in this case.

In the end, the administration might not be able to hold back the tide. And the best reason for releasing the photos could be to protect Internet users from themselves, to keep them from chasing malicious links in e-mails, websites and social media platforms in search of the photos.


About the Author

Kevin McCaney is a former editor of Defense Systems and GCN.

inside gcn

  • power grid (elxeneize/

    Electric grid protection through low-cost sensors, machine learning

Reader Comments


I don't agree with the theme of this article that they should be released to reduce spearphishing and social engineering attacks on the general populace. The general populace already gets fooled daily by all the other non-sense issues in society that is utilized to do the same sort of attacks. What I do agree on is that the photos should be released. It pisses me off that as a member of the Armed Forces(Army) who spent a year in Afghanistan on a combat assignment dealing with IEDS, rocket attacks, small arms engagements and having to pick up the pieces when either us, the Afghan Army or coalition partners, or civilians got blown to pieces, my government now tells me the pictures are too graphic for me? Really? Maybe next time they should go clean up the mess because we are not authorized to see that stuff.

Fri, May 13, 2011 Jeff Atlanta

I disagree that openly putting them on the web would protect Internet users. The photos are not now on the web and the government has told everyone that fact. If the photos are ultimately released and posted, it would actually drive many more people to the web and exponentially increase the possibility that malicious operators would lure people in to dangerous sites. How could you prevent that? Put an "authentic" sticker on the websites with real pictures? No, the pictures don't need to be posted -- least of all for the reason of protecting Internet users.

Fri, May 13, 2011

I think I'll just wait 'til they come out on ikileaks...

Fri, May 13, 2011 Eric Rochester, NY

Right on Suzanne! Nuff said.

Fri, May 13, 2011 Suzanne Klaus

I wish people would just leave this alone - they do not need to see photos of Bin Laden's body. Sheesh! Enough already.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group