Enterprises skeptical about UC on a public cloud
- By Kurt Mackie
- Jun 15, 2011
It seems like public clouds are being used for just about everything these days. But when it comes to employing unified communications (UC) services over a public cloud, mid-to-large U.S. enterprises are skeptical about the concept, an industry-commissioned study released June 15 has found.
The study, conducted by Osterman Research, found that just 10 percent of survey respondents planned to deploy public cloud-based UC services within the next year. The top reason for not using UC services over a public cloud was "loss of customization and IT control," according to 58 percent of respondents. Other reasons included a "lack of confidence in public cloud uptime claims" and a perceived low level of security.
Seattle-based Azaleos Corp., one of Microsoft's top Gold Certified Partners, commissioned the study. According to a spokesperson for Azaleos, the study "was a broad U.S. survey of 100+ enterprise IT executives conducted in May 2011. All respondents were/are knowledgeable about and decision makers relating to their companies' UC systems."
Azaleos specializes in Exchange e-mail, collaboration and UC technologies, along with managed services, for Fortune 500 and midmarket organizations. The study results don't look promising even as Microsoft gets ready to launch its Office 365 services, which include UC technologies. Microsoft plans to launch Office 365 on June 28, with services offered through Microsoft or its partners.
It's all good, despite some IT skittishness about the public cloud, according to Scott Gode, Azaleos' vice president of product management and marketing.
"I believe it is going to be an exciting thing," Gode said of the Office 365 launch, in a phone interview. "At the end of the day, no matter how strong or weak the perception of that offering is when it comes out of the chutes, the fact that Microsoft is bringing a lot of marketing muscle and a lot of attention focusing on the cloud -- and particularly unified communications in the cloud for e-mail and SharePoint and linked-up applications -- is good for partners overall because it encourages businesses and the IT decision makers in those business to take the pulse of what's happening."
The study, "UC in the Cloud: Ready for Primetime?: Cloud Realities in the Age of Office 365," cited some common objections to using the Microsoft Business Productivity Online Services and its coming successor, Office 365. The online services are perceived as having some "limited functionality and features." Areas of concern include Lync's PBX integration, Active Directory Federation Services 2.0 security with regard to single point of failure, SharePoint integration and "inadequate support for BlackBerry Enterprise Server," according to the study. IT pros want a "de-migration" possibility to bring capabilities back in house. They also want service level agreements that include response time, as well as service availability.
The study flat out says that "if decision makers had to choose a public-cloud unified communications provider, only one-third would choose Microsoft BPOS or Office 365." Data security, as well as fears that the services aren't mature yet, typifies the concerns, according to the study.
The UC cloud outlook is not all gloomy for Microsoft and its partners. Of those who say they will not deploy public cloud UC services, nearly half (48 percent) would opt for a private cloud deployment, which is perceived as a more secure option. Hybrid clouds, tapping both public and private cloud infrastructure, were perceived as an option for 45 percent of respondents. The possibility of using hybrid cloud architecture boosted the responses of those planning to move within the next year from 10 percent to 26 percent.
The study notes that while the adoption of cloud services for e-mail has overall momentum, using the public cloud for UC services "is relatively slow" yet. UC purportedly ties together a number of communications solutions, such as e-mail, voice-over-IP telephony, presence, calendaring and Web conferencing, among others.
The 11-page study can be downloaded for free from Azaleos' white paper site here (requires sign-up).
A more optimistic survey about the prospects for cloud-based UC was conducted by CDW-G in February, as described here.