US energy systems have disaster written all over them

The U.S. power industry, with the support of the government, is engaged in a massive effort to upgrade the nation’s power grid from a 19th-century infrastructure to a smart system that takes advantage of and is capable of supporting 21st-century technology.

It is a big job, but technologically it is fairly straightforward. We create a standards-based, interoperable network that is capable of two-way transmission of power and data. The challenges are twofold: How do we take advantage of this smart grid infrastructure to reduce our dependence on traditional fossil fuel, and how do we secure it?

Related coverage:

Smart-grid dividend: security and intelligence already built in

4 'smart' lessons from the Great Southwestern Blackout

The two issues are closely related. By enabling the use of nontraditional energy sources, such as solar and wind generation, we not only can reduce our dependence on foreign oil but also create a more robust, resilient system that is less vulnerable to attacks.

Former CIA Director James Woolsey made this point recently at a discussion hosted by the Northern Virginia Technology Council. His view of the threats to our electric grid is a little extreme, but much of his proposed solution makes sense.

“We have a condition with our infrastructure in the U.S. that is a disaster waiting to happen,” Woolsey said. Taking down the power grid would throw the country back to the 1870s, he said, and we have enemies who are eager to do just that. “It is worse than a jungle out there. It is very, very dangerous.”

Dangerous? Yes. But it would not be that easy to take us back to the 1870s and strand us there. In the first place, today’s grid system already is resilient. It is owned and operated by about 3,500 organizations, interconnected but also independent. Massive power outages demonstrate some of the weaknesses of the system, but also its strengths. Outages are isolated, and power is fairly quickly restored when they do occur. Studies have shown that it would be difficult if not impossible to bring down a significant portion of our power grid at the same time, and interconnections could allow us to work around the intentional destruction of equipment to restore power.

Secondly, any enemy who attacked our power grid, with bombs or with bits and bytes, would be risking retaliation from our military. No nation that is not willing to face us militarily is likely to launch a cyberattack against our power grid.

Still, we would be foolish not to defend our systems to the best of our ability. As part of this defense, Woolsey advocates an even more decentralized power system, replacing or augmenting the current system of large generating facilities with more distributed generation. Local generators operating on a small scale could feed enough power into the system from enough locations that large-scale disruption would be even more difficult.

Nobody wants a nuclear reactor or a coal-fired power plant in his back yard, but solar, wind or other generating sources could provide local sources of energy that also could be consumed regionally or even nationally as needed.

This is just what the smart grid could enable, but two things need to be done to make it practical. Nontraditional power sources need to become more efficient than they are today, and energy storage technology needs to become much more efficient to enable the storage and distribution of significant amounts of energy from inconsistent sources such as the sun and wind.

Advances in these technologies could go a long way toward creating a more economical, efficient, secure and resilient power system for our nation.

inside gcn

  • When cybersecurity capabilities are paid for, but untapped

Reader Comments

Tue, Feb 14, 2012 Joe

I believe electric companies need to reverse flow of power. Make each home a power source powering the grid. We are all at work, it is sunny outside, my house could be putting power on the grid to power my job. Better yet hybrid solar panels to make hydrogen, to power a fuel cell to generate electricity: (

Tue, Feb 14, 2012 pipergal

It's not out of the question that vast millions of people could lose their electricity for days. It's already happened. Anyone remember the Northeast blackout of 2003 that affected 55 million people? It looks like 7 states plus canada were affected as well as huge cities like New York city on the map on A failure of one electrical company had a cascading effect. It was unbelievable! It wasn't more people out of electricity because some companies had someone who wasn't asleep at the switch and disconnected from other companies before they were also taken down catastrophically. In NY, we regularly lose power, even 4 days at a time, and there are other unfortunates that have lost power for far longer due to weather.

Mon, Feb 13, 2012 Rick

When NIF soon achieves repeatable fusion, then a number of distributed IFs will solve all these problems.

Mon, Feb 13, 2012

Yeah, right. Everyone will welcome windmills in their backyard. Just research how Teddy Kennedy fought them.

Mon, Feb 13, 2012

One well placed EMP and its all over....

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group