Transparency group supports DATA Act, standardized reporting tools
- By William Jackson
- Apr 17, 2012
A group of tech companies and public interest groups has formed a
coalition to lobby for standardized requirements and formats for
reporting and tracking government spending.
The Data Transparency Coalition is calling for passage of the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act,
or DATA Act, which would make the current Recovery.gov website a
permanent online portal for tracking government spending, as well as
adoption of other technical standards to make government more
Right now the government is not managing its information, which
allows waste and fraud to go undetected, said Earl Devaney, a member of
the coalition’s board of advisers and former Interior Department
inspector general. The tools and technology to do this exist in the
Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, created to track
stimulus spending, but the board and its Recovery.gov website are set to expire in September 2013.
Panel adds future-proofing, wireless pieces to smart grid plan
Devaney, who also was chairman of the Recovery Accountability and
Transparency Board, said the DATA Act is the quickest way to expand the
“It worked, so why not use it?” he said. “I’ve been part of the
bureaucracy for decades. If you want to see bureaucrats act fast, pass
Adoption of such a platform would increase agency efficiency and
improve regulatory compliance and transparency, said Hudson Hollister,
the coalition’s executive director. Government suffers from a lack of
standards for identifying, displaying and tracking data, which makes it
difficult if not impossible to locate and compare meaningful
information, he said.
“The technology that is needed for this is there, but it has not
been put in place because it’s nobody’s job to do so,” Hollister said.
“There needs to be a private-sector campaign for data reform.”
The coalition was announced April 16. Founding members include tech
companies such as Microsoft, Teradata and Level One Technologies, as
well as trade associations and nonprofit groups such as the Maryland
Association of CPAs.
In addition to the DATA Act, the coalition is promoting passage of the Public Online Information Act and the Financial Industry Transparency Act as well as adoption of a standard identifier for companies that would be used by all regulatory agencies.
The Public Online Information Act would require that all public
government information be published online in a machine-readable
fashion. The Financial Industry Transparency Act would require adoption
of consistent markup languages, such as XBRL, by financial regulators
for the information reported to them.
Some coalition members have an interest in the adoption of
technology standards, such as IPHIX LLC, which provides training and
software for XBRL reporting.
The DATA Act would establish a new Federal Accountability and
Spending Transparency Board that would assume the current functions of
the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board. The new board would
collect and serve as the authoritative government source for
information on federal spending.
Devaney said pilot programs have gauged the practicality of expanding the current Recovery.gov platform’s use.
“It’s something that could be scaled up very easily,” he said. He
said the current Recovery Board has about 40 people working on it, and
that the same number of people would be adequate to handle reporting of
all government spending. That would be more economical than building
agency-specific portals, he said. “Why build centers all over
government if you already have one built?”
William Jackson is freelance writer and the author of the CyberEye blog.