secure election (WhiteDragon/Shutterstock.com)

Senate committee wraps up investigation, issues election security recommendations

Lawmakers from the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence announced they have concluded part of their investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

“We’re now at a point where we have wrapped up one piece of our investigation which deals with election security,” said Committee Chairman Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) at a March 20 press conference.

There is still no evidence of any votes being changed, but it is clear Russia tried to access 21 state-level election systems and was successful in “penetrating at least one voter database,” Burr said. “Clearly the Russians had intent to cause chaos in the U.S. election system and they had the capabilities to do it.”

The committee also released a draft version of its recommendations for improving the nation’s election infrastructure. These recommendations cover six distinct areas and include advice on deterrence, information sharing, securing election systems and providing assistance to states.

To improve information sharing, the committee recommended that the Department of Homeland Security set up clearer communication channels between state and federal officials.  DHS failed to provide states with the information necessary to deal with the Russian threat after IP addresses from Russians were first detected on systems in 2016, the committee concluded.

“In the beginning, there was such mistrust between the states and DHS that information that should have been shared, that would have caused the states to act more aggressively, was not shared,” Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) said DHS has since improved its relationships with states and is working to help secure election systems though assessments and other means, but much work remains to be done.

The committee also recommended that information on election-systems risk be declassified as quickly as possible to share with more state and local officials, and that more state-level officials get security clearances in the coming months so they can receive threat information in something closer to real time.

Voting infrastructure in many districts across the county must also be updated to meet best practices and current standards, the committee advised. There are currently 40 states using voting equipment that is more than a decade old, Warner said, and much of that equipment is running software that can’t be updated.  Fourteen states still have no auditable paper trail.

The committee also recommended making risk-limiting audits of election results a standard practice.

A proponent of RLAs explained the importance of these measures to GCN last year.

“There is no such thing as unhackable computer technology,” Philip Stark, the associate dean of the Division of Mathematical and Physical Sciences at University of California at Berkeley said after voting machines were breached at the DefCon hacker conference.  “So the only way that you can get some reassurance that computers did the right thing is have a way to make an end run around them and check that they functioned correctly.”

Other cybersecurity best practices recommended by the committee include the use of two-factor authentication and keeping voting machines disconnected from Wi-Fi networks.

DHS has offered to conduct assessments of state election systems, but there have been backlogs in that effort.  The agency insists it will finish all assessments before the next election.

In a recent roundtable discussion with reporters, DHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Cybersecurity and Communications Rick Driggers said a full assessment takes about two weeks -- "a week of prep and then a week on site." The process is getting somewhat easier as the parties develop a working relationship, he added.

"I think that from 2016 to now we've certainly learned a lot about what the election infrastructure is and what it looks like," he said. "We've also learned what the infrastructure community is, who to contact, who to work with, at the state and local level.

At the March 20 press conference, Burr said DHS should be looking into ways to provide the needed resources to complete more assessments. States and localities also will need help to update their election systems in the form of both standards and funding, said Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.).

The recommendations specifically call for Congress to pass legislation “to [increase] assistance and [establish] a voluntary grant program for the states” to help make these changes a reality.

The draft recommendations came one day ahead of a three-panel hearing before the committee on election security. A final report on the committee's findings will come after the hearing, Burr said.

Troy K. Schneider contributed to this report.

About the Author

Matt Leonard is a reporter/producer at GCN.

Before joining GCN, Leonard worked as a local reporter for The Smithfield Times in southeastern Virginia. In his time there he wrote about town council meetings, local crime and what to do if a beaver dam floods your back yard. Over the last few years, he has spent time at The Commonwealth Times, The Denver Post and WTVR-CBS 6. He is a graduate of Virginia Commonwealth University, where he received the faculty award for print and online journalism.

Leonard can be contacted at mleonard@gcn.com or follow him on Twitter @Matt_Lnrd.

Click here for previous articles by Leonard.


inside gcn

  • federal blockchain

    How blockchain can transform the public sector

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group