cybersecurity expenses

Congress reaches deal for state election security grants

A spending deal in Congress gives the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) $425 million in grant funding for states to upgrade election infrastructure. The deal gives states their second helping of federal funding and requires them to provide 20% in matching funds within two years.

Earlier this year, the Senate set aside $250 million for upgrading election security. The House, meanwhile, pushed for $600 million in new election security grants and imposed strict mandates that would have steered states towards purchasing voting machines with paper audit trails and implementing risk limiting audits. The compromise deal agreed to contains broader language.

It specifies the money may be used "for activities to improve the administration of elections for federal office, including to enhance election technology and make election security improvements," language that could open the door to a much wider variety of spending decisions by states.

States may use the funding for several purposes specified in a joint explanatory statement, including replacement of  "voting equipment that only records a voter's intent electronically with equipment that utilizes a voter-verified paper record" as well as on post-election audit systems, computer system upgrades that address vulnerabilities identified by scans or assessments, cybersecurity training for election officials and "other activities that will improve the security of elections for Federal office."

Lawrence Norden of the Brennan Center for Justice called the deal "an important step" but stressed that "this funding should not be Congress's only investment in election security." He also urged states to use this one-time infusion of federal dollars wisely.

"Recipients of this federal funding must use it to increase the security of our nation's election infrastructure, and ensure that in the face of cyberthreats, all Americans are able to vote with confidence in free and fair elections," Norden said in a statement.

Some election security experts have warned that tougher language was needed to ensure states do not repeat the same mistakes when buying election technology. In October, election auditing specialist and Def Con Voting Village member Maggie MacAlpine said that Congress giving money to states without any strings attached "might make the situation much worse."

The bill also funds the EAC's own operations at $15.2 million, up $6 million from 2019 and more than $3.2 million higher than the figure sought in the president's budget request. A congressional one-sheet said the funding will allow the EAC to "ensure that voting systems are tested to federal standards as well as provide information to support the voting process, and effective and efficient election administration."

This article was first posted to FCW, a sibling site to GCN.


About the Author

Derek B. Johnson is a senior staff writer at FCW, covering governmentwide IT policy, cybersecurity and a range of other federal technology issues.

Prior to joining FCW, Johnson was a freelance technology journalist. His work has appeared in The Washington Post, GoodCall News, Foreign Policy Journal, Washington Technology, Elevation DC, Connection Newspapers and The Maryland Gazette.


  • Records management: Look beyond the NARA mandates

    Records management is about to get harder

    New collaboration technologies ramped up in the wake of the pandemic have introduced some new challenges.

  • puzzled employee (fizkes/

    Phish Scale: Weighing the threat from email scammers

    The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Phish Scale quantifies characteristics of phishing emails that are likely to trick users.

Stay Connected

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.