Blog archive
International flags

Putting cybersecurity on the diplomatic agenda

The Defense Department has recognized cyberspace as a battle domain, alongside the traditional domains of land, sea and air, and the more recent addition, space. While nations are preparing for war in the new domain of cyberspace, the EastWest Institute (EWI) is working for peace -- or at least a measure of security.

“Securing cyberspace is really a group challenge,” said Harry Raduege, chairman of Deloitte LLP's Center for Cyber Innovation. “It can’t be solved by any company or country alone.”

In an effort to provide a forum for addressing that challenge, EWI held its third Worldwide Cybersecurity Summit in New Delhi on Oct. 30 and 31. What distinguishes the EWI summit is the level of quasi-official government representation, said Raduege, a retired Air Force general. Scheduled attendees from the United States included the State Department’s coordinator for cyber issues, Chris Painter, and ministerial level participation from other countries. Howard Schmidt attended the first two summits, in Dallas and London, as White House cybersecurity coordinator.

“It’s an opportunity for track II diplomacy,” Raduege said, in which non-officials and officials acting unofficially can talk over issues that haven’t yet risen to the level of official consideration. By identifying areas of agreement or at least common concern, they can lay the groundwork for more formal talks. EWI efforts to date have included a report on ensuring the reliability of undersea communications cables and efforts to establish international rules for governing cyber conflicts.

Track II diplomacy also has produced some unlikely partnerships. The United States and China collaborated on a report on fighting spam and botnets, and Raduege is a member of a working group (the institute calls them breakthrough groups) exploring the possibility of a cyber détente between the United States and China. Both countries are dependent on cyberspace, he said, and are looking for areas of agreement. “We are talking -- that is better than accusing each other.”

The United States and Russia recently collaborated on a report that produced common definitions for 20 key cybersecurity concepts, the beginning of what is hoped will be a comprehensive international cyber taxonomy. Cooperation on cybersecurity policy between the two countries has been hampered in part because they do not speak the same language. Establishing common definitions does not eliminate the real differences in how the two countries approach their interests in cyberspace, but it provides a starting place for talking about them, Raduege said.

Centuries of experience in the traditional military domains has shown that countries with widely differing points of view and interests can get along on land, sea and in the air. They are not always on friendly terms, and wars cannot always be avoided. But finding some common ground makes it possible to avoid at least some of the conflict.

Cyberspace is new, but it is not too soon to begin looking for common ground there, too.

Posted by William Jackson on Nov 06, 2012 at 9:39 AM

inside gcn

  • data wrangler

    Data wrangling: How data goes from raw to refined

Reader Comments

Thu, Nov 8, 2012

Is there such a dependency in other countries, to use "cyberspace" to transact? It forms the basis for a more connected, engaged and open world. Maybe the misperception to fight is the attainment of the status as a global wifi hotspot? The rights and priviledges of having internet should go to the people (all of us-group an extension of the tenth (a measure of liberty) and second amendment(a measure of security) by international law, and that would be a great achievement in terms of global unity and support universal aspirations, like space based systems and collective-co-op ecosystems (mentioned as the top story). The govt, free trade partnerships,like EWI-a cultural and knowledge exchange (that precipitates transitions toward peaceful outcomes)could be real leaders. Media outlets participation is vital to that. For energy the global initiative needs pipelines, and for democratization of information it needs cables, Sats, etc. A measure of security would be avoid integration of these socialist responses. look up-- Hegemony and Socialist Strategy- in wikipedia.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above


HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Transforming Constituent Services with Business Process Management
  • Improving Performance in Hybrid Clouds
  • Data Center Consolidation & Energy Efficiency in Federal Facilities

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group