Emerging Tech

Blog archive
Printable guns wiki weapon

Will 3D printing have to be regulated?

The other week I blogged about how users working with emerging 3D printing technology were rapidly changing the landscape. In a few years, 3D printing may no longer just be a cool hobbyist trend, but a bona fide science that could really help out government. Putting a 3D printer in key offices means simply printing out whatever tool, part or object is needed, as it’s required.

However, some people are taking 3D printing to the extreme and are printing out rifles and other weapons.  I predicted, as silly as it sounds, that the government may need to take an interest in 3D printing, perhaps adding safeguards to this new generation of printers in the same way it does to regular 2D printers to prevent counterfeiting or other misuse.

It seems companies that make 3D printers may be thinking along the same lines. This week, Stratasys, which makes very high-end 3D printers, confiscated a 3D printer from a man named Cody Wilson, despite the fact that he had leased it for $20,000, not a small sum for an emerging tech company to earn.

Wilson’s offense? He leads the Wiki Weapon project, which aims to create user-tradable specifications for creating firearms. If Wilson’s team successfully creates designs for working guns and then freely gives them away, it would enable almost any 3D printer to create a firearm. Users would just need to download the file and print the gun out.

Some people are ahead of Wilson and his team, already creating working weapons on 3D printers that were successfully tested at a firing range.

Stratasys’s move to take back its printer will slow, but not stop, people from exploring extreme 3D printing. Wilson, who raised $20,000 in a Kickstarter campaign, has vowed to continue. And Stratasys does not control the entire market.

The government already works with 2D printer companies to restrict certain kinds of printing. Xerox and HP printers add tiny, hard-to-see yellow spots onto pages that identify the serial number and make of a printer, which can help prosecutors in counterfeiting cases.

It would not be a stretch to think that the government will step in and force 3D printer makers to do something similar. Given the free and independent nature of the 3D printer community, regulation would probably not be welcome. But it may come nonetheless, and I’m not so sure it would be a bad thing.

Posted by John Breeden II on Oct 03, 2012 at 9:39 AM

inside gcn

  • When cybersecurity capabilities are paid for, but untapped

Reader Comments

Thu, Oct 4, 2012 Ron

Absolutely, making your own gun is legal. However, all of the current projects producing working material are only creating the stocks for weapons (buttstocks, foregrips, etc.). The receivers and barrels are still produced by gun manufacturers. While Mr. Wilson does plan on printing the entire gun, I suspect it will be a long time before anyone figures out how to print the receivers and barrels for anything - at least more than a .22 caliber. I should also point out that CAD designs for many weapons are already freely available which can be plugged into a CNC milling machine to quickly produce a "real" firearm. No one has ever said anything about that!?!?

Thu, Oct 4, 2012

According to the people in the federal government who regulate guns, making your own gun is perfectly legal. I recommend everyone just that, make their own gun. Most people seem to forget that the Second Amendment was written to: protect the First Amendment, and make sure that the government they were creating would NOT try to have a Lexington/Concord (confiscation of all guns).

Thu, Oct 4, 2012 David Weber Taylor, Texas

Read about this in Austin paper! I think that this type of thing could stiffle creativity. The 3D technology is here it it is now and the future is multifaceted. A person can buy a manufactured gun cheaper than printing one. Let people play with their ideas. The 3D gun would be the template for a manufacturing process.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above


HTML - No Current Item Deck
  • Transforming Constituent Services with Business Process Management
  • Improving Performance in Hybrid Clouds
  • Data Center Consolidation & Energy Efficiency in Federal Facilities

More from 1105 Public Sector Media Group