GCN Tech Blog

By GCN Staff

Blog archive

IPv6 or no IPv6?

What to make of survey results released today by Cisco Systems and Market Connections? We at GCN were pre-briefed last week and still spent this morning scratching our heads over the significance of the survey of 200 government IT managers regarding their take on IPv6.

It goes without saying that respondents were worried there isn't any money allocated to the task of migrating network backbones to the new Internet protocols by June 2008. Because there isn't. And while Cisco officials last week described how agencies are seemingly behind in planning for and implementing IPv6, the results don't appear to indicate at this time that any agency is in danger of missing the OMB-mandated deadline. (Granted, that could change, and probably will.)

Aaron Heffron, vice president of Market Connections, which conducted the survey on Cisco's behalf, accompanied Cisco to GCN's offices last week and offered this take: "IPv6 is seen as an IT issue, not a business issue." In other words, IT shops are out upgrading networks, but not because they really understand or believe in the benefits to the agency's mission.

According to the survey results, security is the top reason to move to IPv6 (in yet another blow to work-at-home proponents, few seemed to care about how IPv6 could help enable effective teleworking).

By the numbers (and remember, these are shares of respondents, some of whom, not surprisingly, had no idea what their agencies were doing with IPv6):

About 43 percent of respondents said they'd inventoried their existing devices for IPv6-readiness.

Interestingly, 51 percent said they'd implement IPv6 all the way to the desktop (the current mandate applies only to network backbones).

Just 14 percent said implementation is underway at their agency, but with two years to go, that's not shocking--yet.

Less than 8 percent said their agencies had finished their transition plans (not shocking, see above).

4 percent actually said they were done--if you're one of them, drop us a note so we can learn more.

Overall, the Cisco/Market Connections data seems to jibe with what we've been hearing about IPv6 to date. But here's the info nugget we think says the most. The one that stops us from scratching our heads and makes us say, "Ah-ha, that's interesting."

This according to today's statement from Cisco accompanying the results: "More than 53 percent say they are likely or somewhat likely to consider IPv6 if it were not mandatory."

That's the networking vendor's glass-is-half-full interpretation. What we read is that many of the government IT managers Market Connections called weren't likely to move to IPv6 if OMB weren't making them--or had no idea one way or another. That may be the clearest indication yet that the benefits of IPv6 aren't well understood. Or are they? Hit the Comments link below and let us know.

Posted by Brad Grimes

Posted by Brad Grimes, Joab Jackson on Jun 26, 2006 at 9:39 AM


  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.