IPv6 or no IPv6?
What to make of survey results released today by Cisco Systems and Market Connections? We at GCN were pre-briefed last week and still spent this morning scratching our heads over the significance of the survey of 200 government IT managers regarding their take on IPv6
It goes without saying that respondents were worried there isn't any money allocated to the task of migrating network backbones to the new Internet protocols by June 2008. Because there isn't. And while Cisco officials last week described how agencies are seemingly behind in planning for and implementing IPv6, the results don't appear to indicate at this time that any agency is in danger of missing the OMB-mandated deadline. (Granted, that could change, and probably will.)
Aaron Heffron, vice president of Market Connections, which conducted the survey on Cisco's behalf, accompanied Cisco to GCN's offices last week and offered this take: "IPv6 is seen as an IT issue, not a business issue." In other words, IT shops are out upgrading networks, but not because they really understand or believe in the benefits to the agency's mission.
According to the survey results, security is the top reason to move to IPv6 (in yet another blow to work-at-home proponents, few seemed to care about how IPv6 could help enable effective teleworking).
By the numbers (and remember, these are shares of respondents
, some of whom, not surprisingly, had no idea what their agencies were doing with IPv6):
About 43 percent
of respondents said they'd inventoried their existing devices
Interestingly, 51 percent
said they'd implement IPv6 all the way to the desktop
(the current mandate applies only to network backbones).
Just 14 percent
said implementation is underway
at their agency, but with two years to go, that's not shocking--yet.
Less than 8 percent
said their agencies had finished their transition plans
(not shocking, see above).4 percent actually said they were done
--if you're one of them, drop us a note so we can learn more.
Overall, the Cisco/Market Connections data seems to jibe with what we've been hearing about IPv6 to date. But here's the info nugget we think says the most. The one that stops us from scratching our heads and makes us say, "Ah-ha, that's interesting."
This according to today's statement from Cisco accompanying the results: "More than 53 percent say they are likely or somewhat likely to consider IPv6 if it were not mandatory."
That's the networking vendor's glass-is-half-full interpretation. What we read is that many of the government IT managers Market Connections called weren't likely to move to IPv6 if OMB weren't making them--or had no idea one way or another. That
may be the clearest indication yet that the benefits of IPv6 aren't well understood. Or are they? Hit the Comments link below and let us know.Posted by Brad Grimes
Posted by Brad Grimes, Joab Jackson on Jun 26, 2006 at 9:39 AM