GCN Tech Blog

By GCN Staff

Blog archive

No brand names...unless it's Google

I'm frankly not sure where I stand on the "no-brand-names" requirement the Office of Management and Budget has been pushing on agencies. Basically, OMB doesn't want agencies specifying technology brands in their requests for proposals. Specifically, chip-maker Advanced Micro Devices was tired of reading solicitations that asked for Intel processors and, perhaps justifiably, made a substantial fuss. (Last year, when the Office of Federal Procurement Policy issued its first no-no memo on the topic, GCN found more than 109,000 instances of agencies looking for Intel Pentium processors on FedBizOpps.gov.)

If I'm buying a new PC for home, or 100 new PCs for my organization, and I know I like, say AMD's Opteron processors, with their direct connect and hyper transport technologies, I think I should be able to ask the guy at CompUSA or CDW-G to show me all their AMD Opteron-based systems. But I understand we're talking about spending other people's money--lots of it--when it comes to government IT, so I tend to side with OMB.

Which is the long way of saying some of us at GCN were bemused to see a solicitation posted Tuesday on FedBizOpps. It appears the Navy Warfare Development Command wants an enterprise search appliance, capable of handling 500,000 documents with two years of support plus updates. But the command doesn't want just any search appliance, such as the Thunderstone Search Appliance, which they could buy off GSA's Schedule 70. According to the request for quote, it's looking for "Quantity (1): Google Search Appliance GB-1001."

Quotes are due August 2.

No biggie? It's just a one-off? And hey, OMB was thinking of $25,000+ procurements when it issued its no-brand-names guidance.

But according to Google itself, an appliance that searches 500,000 documents starts at $30,000.

An e-mail sent to the contracting officer asking how the Navy's Google RFC fits into the no-brand-names framework was not immediately answered. We'll keep you posted.

Posted by Brad Grimes

Posted by Brad Grimes, Joab Jackson on Jul 27, 2006 at 9:39 AM


Featured

  • Comment
    Pilot Class. The author and Barbie Flowers are first row third and second from right, respectively.

    How VA is disrupting tech delivery

    A former Digital Service specialist at the Department of Veterans Affairs explains efforts to transition government from a legacy "project" approach to a more user-centered "product" method.

  • Cloud
    cloud migration

    DHS cloud push comes with complications

    A pressing data center closure schedule and an ensuing scramble to move applications means that some Homeland Security components might need more than one hop to get to the cloud.

  • Comment
    Blue Signage and logo of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    Doing digital differently at VA

    The Department of Veterans Affairs CIO explains why digital transformation is not optional.

Stay Connected

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.