GCN Tech Blog

By GCN Staff

Blog archive

NASA catches heat for data presentation

How much must an agency prepare its raw data before posting it for public consumption? This is the question administrators must keep in mind, especially when the dataset may be a source of controversy.

Over the past few days, NASA has been heavily criticized by Congress and the press for posting results of an airline safety study in a deliberately obscure fashion.

"NASA did not provide documentation on how to use its data, nor did it provide keys to unlock the cryptic codes used in the dataset," the Associated Press charged.

AP also criticized the agency for releasing the data in PDF, rather than on an Excel spreadsheet, which would made the voluminous set of numbers easier to export for further analysis.

(Though if the numbers were posted in Excel, wouldn't NASA get criticized for releasing data in a proprietary format?)

NASA administrator, Michael Griffin said in a press conference that the agency had no plans to analyze the raw data'which was collected as an experimental in collection techniques'but rather just make it available to flight experts.

Griffin also said that it probably did not contain any data that "the traveling public would care about or ought to care about," the Washington Post reported.

The material contained comments alluding to pilot fatigue, potential mid-air collisions and overwhelmed air traffic control facilities.

So, how much preparation should an agency undertake when preparing data that will go online?

Government transparency is generally a desirable thing, but what value is there to posting inscrutable data that would only lead to questions and even charges of malfeasance? Hiding data is no answer either, but many agencies just may not have the resources to make all their data more easily understood.

Sounds like some ground rules'or a well-crafted set of disclaimers'should be put in place.

Posted by Joab Jackson on Jan 02, 2008 at 9:39 AM


Featured

  • Defense
    Ryan D. McCarthy being sworn in as Army Secretary Oct. 10, 2019. (Photo credit: Sgt. Dana Clarke/U.S. Army)

    Army wants to spend nearly $1B on cloud, data by 2025

    Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy said lack of funding or a potential delay in the JEDI cloud bid "strikes to the heart of our concern."

  • Congress
    Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) at the Hack the Capitol conference Sept. 20, 2018

    Jim Langevin's view from the Hill

    As chairman of of the Intelligence and Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committe and a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rhode Island Democrat Jim Langevin is one of the most influential voices on cybersecurity in Congress.

Stay Connected

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.