U.S. designates four Europe-based organizations as terrorist groups

Public Safety
November 20, 2025 · 5:03 PM3 min read

President Donald Trump’s administration recently placed four Europe-based entities on its list of “specially designated global terrorists,” representing the latest development in the administration’s crackdown on the antifa movement. The U.S. State Department announced that four entities—the Antifa Ost, Informal Anarchist Federation/International Revolutionary Front, Armed Proletariat Justice, and the Revolutionary Class Self-Defense—are being named Foreign Terrorist Organizations beginning November 20.

State Department targets European antifa organizations

These four organizations cover the geographic area of Germany, Italy, and Greece. This group of organizations comprises different forms of anarchists and anticapitalist movements that have carried out various attacks on government property and fascist elements. Antifa Ost focuses on the region of Germany and has been attributed with carrying out a series of attacks on individuals that the group recognizes as fascist or right-wing elements during the period of time between 2018 and 2023.

The Informal Anarchist Federation/International Revolutionary Front, with its origins in Italy but with historical ties throughout Europe, South America, and Asia, has taken responsibility for threats and bombs/letter bombs aimed at institutions of the state and economics since 2003. Armed Proletarian Justice and Revolutionary Class Self-Defense are both Greek groups that have carried out attacks using improvised explosive devices with targets that include police offices and ministries.

” Persons who engage with these individuals today may open themselves up to the possibility of sanctions,” the U.S. government warned, focusing on the possibility of secondary sanctions based on counter-terrorism laws.

Critics challenge expanded terrorism definitions under Trump administration

The administration of President Donald Trump stands accused of greatly broadening the definition of terrorism well out of its original context to encompass the drug cartels on the Mexican border and the antifa movements on the other side of the world. Author and historian of the movement, Mark Bray, depicts the movement as an idea more than an organization when he writes of its similarity with the movement of feminism, being a set of ideals and not an organization with centralized control.

This definition causes great concern regarding the rights of freedom of association and of freedom of speech under the U.S. Constitution because of the potential implications of the measures taken by President Trump on the freedom of left-wing movements throughout America. Antifa protests do not typically incite violence; the movement consists of individuals who are not unified either by leadership or by funds.

Internal implications go beyond targets within Europe

President Trump had issued an executive order back in September that labeled the group “a domestic terrorist organization” because it believes that the group consists of a “militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government.” This may make the action of the group voidable under federal jurisprudence that prohibits material support of a terrorist organization.

International implications affect Trans Atlantic security cooperation

The implications of the listings are great for U.S. persons and entities dealing with these groups because property and interests within the United States are blocked under the federal sanctions on the groups. The U.S. government made it clear that the giving of material support or resources to these organizations is a federal crime, with the possibility of an action on charges of conspiracy the attempt.

The four European antifa groups being labeled as terrorist organizations under the new U.S. administration of President Donald Trump represent an unprecedented increase in U.S. counter-terrorism policy over ideological movements. Although proponents believe the new policies address the issue of violent extremism effectively, others believe that there may be an infringement on the right to freedom of speech. This new trend marks a major shift in how the U.S. treats counter-terrorism cooperation with the rest of the world.