Pulse

By GCN Staff

Blog archive
organizations suffer from common data quality errors

U.S. organizations say a third of their data is bad

Agencies are relying on data aggregation and analytics to enhance citizen services and understand social, scientific and financial trends.  Given the meteoric rise in the uses of data aggregation, as well as a growing reliance on its methods, data accuracy is paramount.

Many organizations struggle with data inaccuracy, despite having an established data quality strategy. However, in a startling increase from last year, 1,200 respondents to a global study believe 26 percent of their data is inaccurate, U.S. respondents believe 32 percent of their data is inaccurate. 

The Experian Data Quality’s study noted three common data quality errors: incomplete or missing data, outdated information and inaccurate data. Most organizations cited duplicate data as a contributor to overall inaccuracies , while human error is believed to be the biggest factor in the data spoilage. Lack of automation – and a consequent dependence on manual data input – has also contributed to the problem, the study suggested.

One way to address these concerns is to institute data audit software, Experian suggested, noting that  only 24 percent of their study’s respondents use such software.  Organizations that do not deploy proactive software to detect errors not only waste resources and damage productivity, but they may not be able to derive accurate insights from their data.

Besides auditing technology, organizations can use data profiling or matching and linking technology to detect errors.

In order to make improvements, 89 percent of U.S. organizations will seek to invest in some type of data management solution, Experian said, warning that without a coherent data management strategy, these types of errors will continue to increase. 

Posted by GCN Staff on Feb 03, 2015 at 2:05 PM


Featured

  • Workforce
    By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

    OPM nominee plans focus on telework, IT, retirement

    Kiran Ahuja, a veteran of the Office of Personnel Management, told lawmakers that she thinks that the lack of consistent leadership in the top position at OPM has taken a toll on the ability of the agency to complete longer term IT modernization projects.

  • Defense
    Soldiers from the Old Guard test the second iteration of the Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS) capability set during an exercise at Fort Belvoir, VA in Fall 2019. Photo by Courtney Bacon

    IVAS and the future of defense acquisition

    The Army’s Integrated Visual Augmentation System has been in the works for years, but the potentially multibillion deal could mark a paradigm shift in how the Defense Department buys and leverages technology.

Stay Connected