US polysilicon fell from half of global output to under 2 percent in roughly two decades, and a federal price floor set at 38 cents per watt locks every solar module importer into a minimum sticker before any duty is added

Energy
September 24, 2026 · 9:30 AM5 min read

A glass sheet rolls into one end of a factory line and comes out the other end as a finished solar panel.

The sand-to-silicon chain that feeds it crosses three continents and dozens of furnaces.

It also crosses a market that spent a decade being methodically undercut.

A federal price floor is now trying to put a bottom under it.

How did the US go from leading the world in polysilicon to barely registering, and what does a minimum import price actually do to a supply chain this tangled?

How the new price floor actually works, layer by layer

Most tariff coverage on solar focuses on the final duty rate and stops there. The mechanism signed into effect is more precise. The government created a minimum import price regime covering polysilicon itself, ingots and wafers, solar cells, and finished modules, with each step in the chain carrying its own floor.

The federal price floor is set at $21 per kilogram for raw polysilicon, $100 per kilogram for ingots and wafers, 22 cents per watt for cells, and 38 cents per watt for finished modules. Those are not tariff rates. They are the minimum price a shipment must clear before customs will process it normally, and the duty comes on top.

Raw polysilicon is subject to the minimum import price but is not subject to the new additional tariff applied to covered downstream products. On top of the price floor, ingots and wafers, cells, and modules face an additional 15 percent ad valorem tariff. That architecture is specifically designed to push value-added processing onshore. Combined duties on Chinese-origin modules, stacking the Section 232 minimum-price tariff on existing Section 301 tariffs and applicable anti-dumping orders, could push total charges well above the floor price alone.

The supply chain that made this necessary, from Ohio to Xinjiang

Walk a solar panel backwards from a rooftop in Arizona and the trail gets long fast. Raw quartz gets melted and purified into high-purity polysilicon, a material so clean that a single grain of dust can ruin a batch. That polysilicon is then pulled into ingots, sliced into wafers, treated into cells, and laminated into the module a homeowner or utility buys.

The US is now producing at every major stage of that chain, something that has not happened in over a decade. But producing all steps and dominating all steps are different things. At the wafer and ingot stage, the country remains almost entirely dependent on imports.

A Section 232 investigation found that the quantities and circumstances of polysilicon imports threaten harm to US national security. China controls the vast majority of global polysilicon production. The US is down to two domestic producers after a decade of Chinese price competition pushed one major supplier out entirely.

The collapse in numbers: from 50 percent to under 2 percent

The Section 232 investigation found that US polysilicon production collapsed from approximately 50 percent of global share in 2005 to less than 2 percent in 2024. That is not a gradual drift. It is a structural exit from an entire industrial segment.

The mechanism that drove it was price, not technology. Polysilicon spot prices in China collapsed from roughly $39 per kilogram in 2022 to under $4.50 per kilogram by late 2024, pushing below cash cost for many producers and wiping out margins across the industry. No US or European factory runs profitably at that level.

That is the classic dumping pattern the anti-dumping and countervailing duty framework exists to address, and it is the fact pattern the administration cited in its proclamation. The story is similar for the US module assembly sector, which installed 11.4 GW in the second quarter alone but still sources most cells and wafers from overseas. Big domestic capacity at the module end means little if upstream stages remain foreign-controlled.

Where the mechanism strains: cost pass-through and the exemption race

The architecture of the new rules creates a split market rather than a uniform price shock. US module factories still import most of their cells and wafers, and those inputs now carry price floors of their own, so domestic module pricing will tick upward too, not just the cost of imports. A factory assembling panels in South Carolina still needs wafers, and most of those wafers currently arrive from overseas.

Companies that locked in fixed-price supply agreements before the proclamation are temporarily sheltered. Goods imported before the effective date, including under fixed-price contracts signed before August 6, are largely unaffected. Everyone else is racing to renegotiate.

The proclamation includes an onshoring exemption program for companies that commit to US production of polysilicon, ingots, wafers, and cells. The Suniva cell factory in South Carolina, backed by an $835 million capital raise and targeting 4.5 GW of annual output in Laurens County, is exactly the kind of upstream investment that exemption is designed to accelerate. Trade analysts following the action have described it as one of the more consequential Section 232 measures the US solar industry has faced in recent years.

What the price floor can and cannot fix, and where the industry goes next

A price floor can stop a race to the bottom. It cannot instantly conjure the furnaces, the trained workforce, and the multi-year timelines a full domestic polysilicon chain requires. Building a new polysilicon plant from greenfield to first output typically takes three to five years.

In the near term, the effect is almost entirely a cost shift, not a supply shift. Some of that cost will fall on project developers, some on installers, and some on whoever holds long-term power purchase agreements signed before the rules changed.

The longer-run picture is more open. If polysilicon prices stabilize above the floor and domestic capacity scales to meet demand, the US could rebuild a position in a segment it abandoned during a decade of sub-cost imports. Whether that rebuild happens fast enough to matter for the current wave of solar construction is the real question the industry is now watching.

Hugo Rojas
Editor
Hugo Rojas is the editor of GCN. With a Master of Science in Engineering, he specializes in technology, data, and science, and brings a human-centered perspective informed by psychology.